An academic publishing model in which journals do not charge fees to either authors or readers.

Average time for first decision (excluding desk-rejections): 5 weeks

Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. Volume 28.2 (2005) Pages: 121-130

Minimizing extinction risk through genetic rescue

Waite, T. A., Vucetich, J. A., Saurer, T., Kroninger, M., Vaughn, E., Field, K., Ibargüen, S.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2005.28.0121

Download

PDF

Abstract

According to the genetic rescue hypothesis, immigrants can improve population persistence through their genetic contribution alone. We investigate the potential for such rescue using small, inbred laboratory populations of the bean beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus). We ask how many migrants per generation (MPG) are needed to minimize the genetic component of extinction risk. During Phase 1, population size was made to fluctuate between 6 and 60 (for 10 generations). During this phase, we manipulated the number of MPG, replacing 0, 1, 3, or 5 females every generation with immigrant females. During Phase 2, we simply set an upper limit on population size (.10). Compared with the 0-MPG treatment, the other treatments were equivalently effective at improving reproductive success and reducing extinction risk. A single MPG was sufficient for genetic rescue, apparently because effective migration rate was inflated dramatically during generations when population size was small. An analysis of quasi-extinction suggests that replicate populations in the 1-MPG treatment benefited from initial purging of inbreeding depression. Populations in this treatment performed so well apparently because they received the dual benefit of purging followed by genetic infusion. Our results suggest the need for further evaluation of alternative schemes for genetic rescue.

Keywords

Extinction risk, Founder events, Genetic rescue, Inbreeding

Cite

Waite, T. A., Vucetich, J. A., Saurer, T., Kroninger, M., Vaughn, E., Field, K., Ibargüen, S., 2005. Minimizing extinction risk through genetic rescue. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 28: 121-130, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2005.28.0121

Share

Visits

1578

Downloads

639

Content appears on: