Parataxonomy: a test case using beetles

Abstract

The present study examines the utility of parataxonomic sorting (groupings of similar individuals, categorized by non-experts, relying on features of external morphology) using data from a study of beetle communities in four forest habitats in Nova Scotia, Canada. Alpha diversity and the Shannon-Weaver, Simpson, Berger-Parker, and Brillouin indices of diversity, derived from both taxonomic species and parataxonomic units, are compared and yield identical habitat rankings. Beta diversity rankings derived from both data sets do not differ although they produce slightly different rankings. The Elateridae, Curculionidae, Cantharidae, and Staphylinidae had particularly large numbers of “lumping” and “splitting” errors. Although the overall gross sorting error was only 14%, individual families of beetles had errors between 0% and 200% with an average error of 38%. The limitations of the parataxonomic approach are discussed; both in regard to the practical application of the concept, as well its theoretical basis. We note the spillover of this discourse to the subject of what constitutes a species and observe that this discussion has been misplaced due to the unfortunate confusion of the two usages of the term “morphospecies”.